Stone Ages

Prehistory, Proto-history and Historical Period

• Prehistory refers to a period, for the study of which, only archaeological evidence is

available while literary evidence is totally absent.

• We find two different definitions for the proto-historical period.
• According to the first definition, literary evidence is available for studying the

proto-historic period but is not being utilised or is not contemporary; for

example, the Harappan and Vedic period.

■ The Harappan scripthasnot been deciphered yetandthe Vedicpeople

had dialects or languages but they did not have a script.

• According to the second definition, the proto-historic period is supposed to

have started with the beginning of agriculture.

■ Based on this criterion, even the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods

come under the purview of proto-history.

• The historical period refers to that phase, for the study of which, both the

archaeological evidence and literary evidence are available. It starts from 600 BCE

onwards for India.

Development of Human Civilisation:

• Manufacturing and using tools is the criterion upon which archaeologists recognise

ancient humans. The first evidence of the tools is available roughly from 2.5 million

years ago.

• The Humans (Genus: Homo) first evolved in East Africa about 2.5 million years ago

(m.y.a), after which, they migrated outwards from Africa.

• Then,about 150000 yearsago,Homo Sapiens(Wise Man)appearedin East Africafirst;

then, their migration out of Africa started from about 150000 120000 years ago.

• Currently, the entire Human Civilisation is the Homo Sapiens civilisation.
• Human civilisation is supposed to have evolved through three different phases

1. Stone Age
2. Copper Age
3. Iron Age

Stone Age

• The Stone Age consists of the Paleolithic period, the Mesolithic period and the

Neolithic period. This categorization is based on the changing climate, changes in the

flora and fauna, type and technology of the stone tools and the subsistence base.

• During the Paleolithic period, human beings were in the hunting and food-gathering

stage, while during the Neolithic period, they had reached the food-producing stage.

As a phase of transition between these two periods, some scholars have conceived a

new period, that is the Mesolithic period.

• We should remember that there is a great deal of variation in the dates for the

different sites.

• Forexample,recentlyat Attirampakkamnear Chennai,thetransitionfrom the

lower Paleolithic to the Middle Paleolithic was observed in the artefacts dated

around 385000 years ago. Before this, the earliest transition we saw was

pegged around 125000 years ago.

• Palaeolithicage sitesbelongto the Pleistocenegeological era(the last iceage)andthe

Mesolithicera onwards,we are livinginthe Holocene geologicalera (the period of de-

glaciation).

1. Paleolithic period (5 Lakh BCE to 10,000 BCE)

• During this entire period, the Pleistocene or the last ice age (2.6 m.y.a. 11700 years

ago) was going on and the climate was harsh. Glaciers covered a much larger part of

the globe. But gradually climatic conditions improved and conditions became

conducive to life.

• On the basis of climatic change and the use of technology even the Paleolithic period

could be divided into three sub-periods, namely lower, middle and upper Paleolithic

ages.

a- Lower Paleolithic period -

• It covers a long time period i.e. from 5 Lakh BCE to 50,000 BCE.
• During thisperiod, the climate was particularly cold and people were mainly using the

'Core implements' for hunting and food gathering.

• The Hand axe and cleavers were the main tools. Chopper was also an important tool.
• Palaeolithic sites have been unearthed from almost all parts of the Indian sub-

continent except the Gangetic basin region and the forested regions of Kerala.

From about 3 lakh years ago, Homo Erectus, Neanderthals and the forefathers of

modern human beings were using fire on a regular basis.

• Stone tools are the mostviable archaeological key to gettingan insight into the livesof

the Stone Age foragers.

• So, it is very important to understand what the different key terms used to

describe different kinds of tools mean.

• When a piece of stone is broken into two, the larger part is called the core and

the smaller part is called the flake.

• Chipping out small pieces from a piece of stone in order to turn it into a usable

tool is called flaking.

• Early Palaeolithic tools were fairly large core tools made of quartzite stone, which is

not so amenable to chipping and flaking.

• A stone hand axe is a core tool, which is usually worked on both sides, i.e. it is

a bi-face.

• A pebble hand axe (made from pebbles) has only one side chipped away.

■ These hand axes could be used alone or they could be tied on a piece of

wood.

• A chopper is usually a core implement and it is flaked on only one side to produce

a tool which then can be used to chop pieces of meat.

■ It is a uni-facial tool.

• A cleaver isa flattish tool made out of rectangular/triangular flakes; whichhas one

straight cutting edge.

• Acheulian tools represent an advanced stage of the lower

Paleolithictoolswhichhavesymmetricalflakingonbothsidesofthehandaxes and

cleavers.

b- Middle Paleolithic period-

• It issupposedtohavestartedaround 50,000 BCEandlastedapproximatelytill 30,000

Bce.

• By this time, the climate was more comfortable.
• Above all, one can underline the change in the nature of tools.
• In place of the 'core implements' the overall balance shifted towards making

the lighter flake implements, some of them actually made by preparing the

core part itself.

 The Levallois technique (named after a suburban area in Paris) is an advanced way of

making flake tools from the core part itself.

c- Upper Paleolithic period-

• It started from about 30,000 BCE and continued till about 10,000 BCE.
• The climate became warmer and more favourable.
• In tools, there was a preponderance of the flake implements now.
• The main tools during this period were blades, scrapers and burins ( they may have

been used to engrave tools or to make grooves in the wood/bone handles in which

stone tools would then be hafted).

• Apart from that, along with the use of stone tools, the use of bone tools and wooden

tools became more frequent, perhaps because of climate change.

• Themostimportanttechnicaladvanceoftheupper Paleolithicageis the double-sided

blade.

• Needle: made of bone and used for sewing. ○

Perforator: used for making holes in hides ○

Harpoon: used for fishing.

• Spear thrower: used to throw javelins

Occupation-

• Food gathering and hunting were the main occupations of the time.
• Earlier, it was believed that hunting was more important in their life than food

gathering but, on the basis of new research, it was proved that food gathering was

more important than hunting.

• This is because of the fact that the meat rots fairly quickly but food gathered

from the jungle or plucked from the trees would last longer.

• Ancient foragers gathered other things like wood, bamboo and stones for making

tools. All this required a very keen understanding of the environment in which they

lived.

Palaeolithic society and culture

• Man was in the hunting and food-gathering stage during this period.

The Palaeolithic people did not lead a sedentary life and they moved from one place

to the other as per the availability of food.

• Their technology was quite rudimentary and they had as yet, not established

dominance over their environment.

• Thus, it is obvious that the human population was quite low.
• For much of the Palaeolithic age, humans were solitary beings.
• They competed with each other for resources such as food, shelter, territory

and sexual partners.

• In some instances, theymay have formed small groups of 2-4, for the purpose

of security.

• As such, the concept of society had not developed initially.
• It was towards the end of the Palaeolithic age, when the climate and human

technology began improving, that they began living in small bands of 20-40.

• Thus, the Upper Paleolithic society represented a band society. It was the

initial phase of human society and co-operation.

• Evidence from the early cave paintings of Bhimbetka throws some light on the

scope of human socio-economic activities.

• The society was egalitarian in nature and resources were used collectively. The

concept of a permanent head or leader had not evolved yet.

• It is believed that the origin of the art, religion, socio-political institutions etc. lay in

the cognitive revolution, which happened among Homo sapiens around 70,000 years

ago.

• Before this cognitive revolution, our learning, memory and communication

abilities were far more limited.This cognitiverevolution in our neural network

took us out of the traffic jam of genetic evolution and put us on the fast lane

of cultural development.

• The first reliable evidence of art, religion and commerce from around the

world began to appear during this period.

■ E.g. a statue of a goddess was unearthed from Lohadanala

(Belan Valley).

■ A sketch on an ostrich eggshell was found from Patne ( Maharashtra ).

■ Apartfromthis,theearlycavepaintingsof Bhimbetka belongedtothe

Upper Paleolithic period.

1. Mesolithic Period (10,000 BCE to 6000 BCE)

• It is the phase of transition from the Paleolithic to the Neolithic period.
• The climatic, technological and occupational changes work as the dividing line

between the Paleolithic period and the Mesolithic period.

• The Pleistocene ice age was now over. The beginning of the Mesolithic period

corresponds to the beginning of the Holocene age which started roughly from 10,000

Bce.

• During this period the climate became drier and warmer.
• The use of microliths is another defining feature of the beginning of the Mesolithic

period.

• But, in some cases, the usage of microliths started in the upper Paleolithic

stage itself, e.g. Patne.

• Also, microliths continued to be used in the historical period.

Technological advancement-

• During the Mesolithic period, people started using tools and implements of better

quality, known as Microliths i.e., small stone implements.

• Normally, Microliths were about 1 cm to 5 cm in size and these tools were

grafted either to wood or bone.

• Microliths were mostly triangular in shape.
• As a result of such changes, there was the development of weapons like bows

and arrows.

Occupations-

• Even during this phase, people continued to hunt and gather food.
• Although they were not in the food-producing stage yet, there was definitely

a change in the method of hunting and gathering.

• A warmer climate meant more ecological diversity.
• Now, there was more to hunt from and more to gather from. ○

Overall, there were more food sources.

• Apart from that, the invention of bows and arrows led to the hunting of fast-moving

birds and animals.

• Further, fishing led to better food availability.
• There is archaeological evidence which proves that permanent fishing villages

were the first permanent human settlements in history.

• Fishing villages appeared along the Indonesian coastline as early as 45,000

years ago.

Overall, these changes resulted in the growth of population and the number of

settlements associated with this period expanded in different parts of the Indian

subcontinent.

• Generally,duringthis period,humansettlementsspreadintonewareas where

the climate was earlier prohibitive.

• As a phase of transition, it had some features of the Neolithic period as well.
• E.g. Although people didn't start the domestication of animals on a regular

basis but from Bagor (Rajasthan) and Adamgarh (M.P) we find the earliest

evidence of domestication of animals.

• Likewise,peopledidn'tstarttoleadasettledlife,butpossiblytheyhadstarted

to spend more time at those locations where food was more easily available.

■ That's why from the sites of Sarai Nahar Rai and Mahadaha (U.P), we

can trace some evidence of uprooted bamboo which was meant for

house-making.

• Apart from that, although the use of pottery became a common phenomenon from

the Neolithic period onwards, we find the earliest evidence of the use of pottery from

the Mesolithic sites of Chopani Mando (Belan Valley -U.P) and Langhnaj ( Gujarat ).

Mesolithic Society and Culture -

• Even the Mesolithic society is an example of a band society.
• Although, the average size of a band must have increased.
• Because, the availability of more food meant a longer life span, meaning that

the number of members in the band increased.

• The concept of the family further evolved during the Mesolithic period.
• Initially, every member of the group would go hunting. But now the older

membersstayed back at those semi-permanent locationsand looked afterthe

children. Thus, the concept of family evolved.

• During this period human cultural sense also evolved.
• This consciousness represented itself in the form of religion and art

e.g. a statue of a goddess was unearthed from Bagor ( Rajasthan ).

• In the same way, jewellery became more elaborate e.g. a necklace made of

animal horn was found from Mahadaha.

• The tradition of burial of the dead body also started during this period.
• This reflects the development of a sense of respect for ancestors.
• Also, people now lived longer in one location. So, simply discarding the dead

body near the site wasn't a good idea.

Paintings:

• Cavepaintingswereanothermajordevelopmentofthis period.Thesepaintingsare

a combination of paintings and carvings.

• Although cave paintings appeared during the Upper Paleolithic period itself,

by the Mesolithic period they became more diverse and vivid in nature.

• Paintings of this period are found from Bhimbetka (near Bhopal),

Suhagighat (Mirzapur), Sundergarh and Sambalpur (Orissa) etc. Paintings

are also found in Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.

• Certain animals got special representation in the cave paintings of thistime. These

animals include deer, tortoise, rabbit, wolf, etc.

• Human representations are also found.
• They reflect the social life of the time. These pictures include scenes of hunting,

group dance, musical instruments, family, pregnant women etc.

• Mesolithic paintings show the actual form of animals but the human

representation is symbolic i.e. only an outline is drawn to represent a man.

• This could have some special meaning. The killing of animals might have

created an emotional stress and no one wanted to be held responsible

individually for the act.

• This may be the reason behind the absence of any individual representation

of a hunter.

• Paintings of females are clearer and closer to reality when compared to that of

men.

• Women were responsible for food gathering, childbirth and child care etc.

■ This represents our usual division of labour.

■ But the social primacy seems to be in favour of women as food

gathering was more important than hunting.

• Thus, we can conclude that Mesolithic paintings represented contemporary life.
• They reflect the economic and social activity of the time and also throw

some light on human emotions.

• The symbolism and diversity of these paintings resemble modern paintings

although their nature is different.

• Mesolithic paintings portray the simple life and emotions of man while

modern paintings are more complex reflecting the complications and

intricacies of modern man.

• However, whenever we try to interpret them, we should be careful not to project

our modern perspective onto these Stone Age paintings. The world of thoughts,

values and emotions is far more difficult to decipher.

• Scholars agree that the Stone Age foragers followed Animism.
• It isunlikeanymodernreligion.Itisbasedonthephilosophy that everyentity-

living and non-living has a soul/consciousness and it can communicate with

human beings.

• But, this much information isn't enough to take a definite stand on the Stone

Age religion.

• We have no wayto tell which band of foragersworshipped which divine entity

and in what manner.

• We can tell about their dietary habits on the basis of the analysis of their bone

structure, but, did they accept the concept of private property? Were they

monogamous?

• Perhaps, there is no way to find the right answers.
• Perhaps, there is no one right answer.
• Hence, our understanding of Stone Age culture is fairly limited.
• The Stone Age should be more accurately called the wood age.
• Artefacts made from more perishable materials like wood, bamboo and

leather, almost never survive.

• Any reconstruction of the Stone Age society on the basis of the available

archaeological evidence will be like trying to reconstruct the life of a 21 st-century

teenager only on the basis of his emails, without having any access to his Facebook

page, text messages and internet browsing history.

1. Neolithic period (6000 BCE onwards)

• The world's first agricultural villages appear on the scene around c. 8000 BCE.
• The earliest neolithic communities appeared in the areas of West Asia, the

Indian Subcontinent, Thailand and South China.

• Later on,Peruvian highlands,Central America, Mexico, sub-Saharan Africaetc.

emerged as the independent cradles of agriculture.

• So far as the latest evidence is concerned, agriculture developed

independently in these cradles.

Evidence

• The first instance of the domestication of any particular plant or animal species took

place in their natural habitat.

• Only later, they were planted in secondary areas.
• When a plant or animal species has been domesticated for many generations, some

morphological changes show up.

• Archaeologists differentiate a domestic breed from a wild one on the basis of

these changes.

• E.g. a domestic animal would have smaller teeth and its horns would shrink.
• Also, animal bones or seeds found outside their natural habitation zones, age and

sex ratio in the animal bones etc. give indirect hints towards domestication.

• Burnt seeds, impressions of seeds on clay or pottery etc. give evidence of agriculture.
• Pollen analysis and examination of soil constituents including the remains/fossils of

the insects can inform us about the pattern of land use.

• However, not all kinds of seeds can survive long. E.g. root crops like potato, which

have no solid parts.

• So, a community may have cultivated these crops, but, we simply can't tell.
• Paintings can attest to Neolithic practices like harvesting, processing and cooking

food.

• But, these are not conclusive as the paintings usually can't tell the difference

between food gathering and producing.

Features

• Some of the common features of a Neolithic community are○ food

production from both crop harvesting and animal rearing;

• using grounded and polished stone tools;
• widespread use of pottery;
• a greater degree of sedentary life in settled villages; ○

a gender-based division of labour etc.

• However, one might see the absence or presence of one or more of the

activitiesmentionedabovetodifferentdegreesindifferentecologicalniches.Inshort,

everything is relative.

• The Neolithic age marks a new stage in the relationship between human beings,

plants and animals.

• When grain is harvested only to consume, that would be called the food

gathering stage.

■ But, when some of the harvested grains are stored for planting later,

a community would then have officially reached the food-producing

stage.

• Similarly, when captured animals are bred in a confined environment, that

would be called the stage of animal domestication.

• Only those societies which depend substantially on domestication and/or

agricultural activities can give birth to permanently settled - and relatively

prosperous- villages.

• However, it is difficult to exactly tell the extent to which a community depended on

these activities for their sustenance.

Technological Upgradation in the Neolithic Age-

• During this period people started using polished stone tools- which were more

efficient.

• Earlier,the stone tools were made bybreakingthe stone by striking it with the

other stone.But,nowtheywere madebyrubbingonestoneagainstthe other.

Such tools worked better in agrarian activities (increased efficiency).

• This period is also linked with the invention of the wheel.

Occupations-

• During this period, human beings moved from the hunting/food-gathering stage to

the food-producing stage.

• Thus started animal rearing and agriculture.
• This period also marks the start of the use of pottery on a much larger scale.
• They were made of clay and were meant for storing grains and cooking food.
• Also, although on a limited scale, even trading activities started during this period.
• E.g at certain sites we find some objects that were not locally available.

It gives us a hint towards trading activities.

Neolithic society:

• Food is not merely for eating. It is a means of creating social bonds and cooperation

structures- within families and outside of it- which are crucial for the survival of the

communities.

• By donating, gifting, hosting feasts and trading in food articles, community

bonds of reciprocity are forged in smaller communities.

■ A chieftain who receives tributes grants safety in return.

■ A sorcerer asks for donations of food in return for performing spells

etc.

• The earliest form oftrade, the barter system, has food as themost important itemof

exchange.

• The evidence of communityfeasts at Budhihal reflectsthe socio-cultural values of the

society based on agriculture.

• Food can impact ethics also.
• Hunter-gatherers had to eat what they found, immediately.
• But, farmers had to think long term.
• Planning for the future and giving it more importance comes to us naturally

today.

• But, farmers may have had to acquire a new social attitude - and organise

their entire society and life - around this new habit.

• Even today,we see the perpetual conflict between our rational thinking which

encouragesustothinklongtermandourimpulsiveselfwhichseeksimmediate

gratification of human desires.

■ Such conflicts inside a person created numerous anomalies like crime,

bad eating habits, indiscipline in studies etc.

• In short, food production had a profound impact on the social order.
• The Neolithic age led to the development of early villages.
• Practically speaking, one might sense the need for a socio-political

organisation to run the affairs of a settled village smoothly.

■ How would people interact with each other?

■ How would they deal with private property?

■ How would they access shared resources like wells?

• So, the social order, which is necessary for a settled community, needs social

ranking.

• The social and political organisation may have varied according to its size smaller

settlements with simpler socio-political order and larger ones living under more

complex orders.

• In these villages, people used to live in houses made of wattle & daub or mud brick

huts.

• The size and design of houses also give us a hint of the social stratification.
• Some houses were round in shape while others were rectangular.

■ So,itisassumedthattheround-shapedhouses,ifalsolargerinsize and

less numerous, may have belonged to the local chief.

• Further, evidence of a granary from the site of Mehrgarh hints at an agrarian surplus.
• This might indicate the rise of chiefdom.
• When precious goods are buried with the dead, it gives a hint of social rank.
• Food production didn't mean that communities stopped hunting and gathering.
• Ethnographic studies point out that, primarily women are associated with gathering

and men are mostly associated with hunting.

• So, when the Neolithic communities first moved on to agriculture, the

gatherers- the women- may have played a more proactive role, at least in the

beginning.

Neolithic lifestyle:

• It is difficult to tell which one is the net cause and which one is the net effect,

sedentary lifestyle or food production.

• But, it is certain that the shift to food production increased the level of

sedentariness.

• A sedentary life and an agriculture-based diet meant less hardship for pregnant

women and infants.

• Sedentary life was also suitable for the elderly.
• So, together these factors led to an increased birth rate and reduced death

rate.

• So, the age profile of the Neolithic communities became more diverse.
• But, it is debatable whether human beings were, on average, better off than the

hunter-gatherers of the bygone era.

• Vagaries of nature continuously threatened crops and livestock.
• Settled villages are also more vulnerable to infectious diseases than the

mobile bands of foragers.

• Analysis of human bones suggests that hunter-gatherers had a high-protein

diet which was also diverse; whereas the early farmers had a carbohydrate-

based diet. This is a nutritional problem even today.

• One might say that the chances of survival increased but the quality of health may

have dropped.

Neolithic Culture:

• Disposing of the dead bodies of loved ones is an emotional issue. Therefore, rituals

and practices associated with the last rites, if identified accurately, can give a hint of

the prevalent human values of the time.

• E.g.Thepracticeofburyingessentia land/orluxurygoods alongwiththedead

reflects a belief in the concept of an afterlife.

• Dead bodies were usually buried in the ground but dead bodies of children were

placed in an earthen urn and buried.

• Evidence of group burial is also available.
• This either indicates simultaneous death due to some common cause or

strengthening kinship ties.

• Human sacrifice cannot be ruled out here.
• Inthesameway,coveringadeadbodywitha Redor Ochrecolouredshroud indicates

some sort of ritual.

• Such evidence is available from Mehrgarh.
• The evidence of human burial with a dog from Burzahom reflects the deepening

relationship between man and animal.

• Both inhumation and secondary burials were practised at Burzahom.
• But, we have no way of finding out the prevalence of cremation and other forms of

disposing of dead bodies.

• Also, did the living fear the dead or revered them or both? ○ We don't know.
• Animal husbandry and agriculture, which were based on production, also led to the

increased importance of fertility cults.

• A numberof statues ofthemothergoddess andthehumpedbull foundinthe

North Western region- Mehrgarh, Mundigak, Rana Ghundai- prove the fact.

• But, we should not attribute any cultic or religious significance to these artefacts

without understanding the archaeological context in which they are found.

Why did communities take to food production?

• V. Gordon Childe suggests that environmental changes- like the extinction of big

prey animals- compelled the push towards agriculture.

• But, one may ask, why the environmental changes in the Pleistocene age did

not lead to domestication?

• Braidwood argues that domestication was a unique initiative out of human

inquisitiveness and a greater understanding of the environment.

• But, even in modern times, foraging tribes don'ttake up agriculture if there

is a balance between population pressure and resource availability, no

matter how well they know their environment.

• Binford suggests that because of the rising sea levels in the Holocene Age, people

were pushed from the coastal areas towards the inland.

• This, in turn, generated population pressure,hence, the incentiveto look for

new methods of food production.

• But, can we talk about population pressure in an era when the human

population was already so low?

Some scholars talk in terms of positive feedback systems,

• i.e. factors like cross-fertilisation increased the growth of certain plants

which attracted the attention of early farming communities.

• So, they leaned more and more towards manipulating the growth of plants

in their surroundings which further developed into full-scale agriculture.

• Another kind of climatic factor might have played its part.The onset of the Holocene

epoch meant a warmer, wetter and milder climate.

• So, the natural habitat of the plants and animals with the potential for

domestication expanded.

• Thus, environmental congeniality rather than pressure paved the way for

cultivation.

But, we should remember that the available archaeological evidence is fairly

limited and it is very difficult to understand complex cultural processes like the

development of agricultural practices and animal domestication without fully

understanding the role of social and political institutions.

Isolating a single causative factor is problematic, so charting the trajectory of this

evolution is a better alternative.

• Perhaps, different sets of factors emboldened the early farming communities in

the different ecological zones.

Does the period represent a revolution in human history?

• Gordon-Childe called this period the 'Neolithic Revolution'.
• But, some scholars question the use of the term 'Revolution'.
• They argue that the changes which took place were not so rapid as to be

called a Revolution.In fact, the changestook place over a longperiod of time

of nearly 3000 years.

• Secondly, most of the activities that came to define the Neolithic Age i.e.

animaldomestication,agricultureandpotteryhadstartedwell before,inthe

Mesolithic Age itself.

• Thirdly, it should be noted that this process of change was initially

concentratedinsomekeygeographicalareasonlyandspreadgradually over

thousands of years.

• On the other hand, the term 'Revolution' should be associated with the Neolithic

period because of the radical changes in the relationship between man and animal

on the one hand and man and land on the other.

• In other words, man moved out of the hunting/food-gathering stage and

entered the food-producing stage.

Further, although it is true that the changes did not take place suddenly and

occurred over a long span of time, the pace of change (during the 3000 years) was

much faster than in the preceding 30,000 years.

• Due to the complex Socio-economic and cultural changes that had occurred during

the Neolithicage,manhadbeenbroughtontheproverbial thresholdofcivilisation.

Expansion of Neolithic Sites in India:-

• In India, Neolithic communities are identified with three broad features- food

production, settled villages and use of pottery. But, the roots of some of these

features go back to the Mesolithic Period in some cases.

• E.g.Langhnajand Kaimur Hills Mesolithicsiteshaveprovideduswithevidence

of pottery.

• Also, the bones of domesticated animals have been found from Bagor,

Ratanpura, Adamgarh etc.

• The level of sedentariness is alsorelative. Aswe know,some Mesolithiccommunities

were already living a fairly settled lifestyle.

• Neolithic communities practised production but it doesn't mean that they

abandoned hunting and gathering activities.

• Different regions of the Indian subcontinent have different regional trajectories.
• E.g. on the northern fringes of the Vindhyas, Neolithic sites emerged over the

earlier Mesolithic sites.

• In the North-West, the earliest settlements seem to belong to the Neolithic

farmers.

• If we find evidence of the use of metal (usually copper), then it will be called a

Neolithic-Chalcolithic site, instead of a pure Neolithic site.

• In certain areas like Rajasthan, the earliest settled communities appear in a

full-fledged Chalcolithic context, skipping both the Neolithic and Neolithic-

Chalcolithic stages.

Mehrgarh

• Mehrgarh is the earliest Neolithic site in the Indian subcontinent. It has been dated to

• 7000 BCE. We have excavated many stratigraphic layers from this site.

• First Stage: 7000 BCE to 5000 BCE
• Second Stage: 5000 BCE to 4000 BCE
• Third Stage: 4300 BCE to 3400 BCE
• Many varieties of charred grains of wheat and barley have been founds here. Even

evidence of cotton is found.

• Sheep, goat and cattle were domesticated here. Evidence of granary and pit burial

have also been found.

North-West

• After Mehrgarh, some other Neolithic sites were discovered from the North-West.
• These were dated between 6000 BCE to 4000 BCE.
• E.g. Kiligul Muhammad, Rehman Dheri, Kila Tarkai, Gumla Amri, Kot Diji etc.
• Fromthepointofviewofdevelopmentofagriculture,thesewererelativelydeveloped

sites.

Kashmir

• Later, in the Kashmir region, sites like Burzahom and Gufkral came into existence

between 3000-2000 BCE.

Northern fringes of the Vindhyas

• Northern fringes of Vindhya Mountains were sites of earlier agricultural and pastoral

communities.

• Koldihwa, Mahagara, Kunjhun, Pachoh and Indari etc. are some of the excavated

Neolithic sites here.

• Evidence of 'rice cultivation' has been found from this area.
• Another speciality of these sites is that these have emerged from earlier Mesolithic

settlements on the same site.

• only,animal husbandryand ricecultivation areadditionalfeaturesof Neolithic

stage.

Gangetic Valley and North-East region

• In the Gangetic Valley and North-East region, we find sites like Narhan (east U.P),

Chirand (Bihar), Pandu Rajar Dhibi (Bengal), Daojali Hading (Assam) etc.

• These sites appeared somewhere between 3000-2500 BCE.
• In South India, Neolithic sites gradually appeared from 2900 BCE onwards and few

sites are dated as near as 1000 BCE

• e.g. Neolithic sites are visible at Utnur (A.P), Paiyampalli (T.N) and Brahmagiri,

Hallur, Mask, and Tekalkotta ( Karnataka ).

• In the Neolithic settlements of south India, animal husbandry was a more

important activity compared to the agriculture.

• We notice that the Neolithic sites in the North-Western region were the earliest and

relatively more developed.

• E.g. From the site of Mehrgarh three varieties of barley, three varieties of

wheat and evidence of dates and cotton were found.

• Apart from that a mud structure was also found.
• This evidence provides some clues as to why a civilisation, like the Harappan

civilisation, developed in the region of the northwest.

Chalcolithic Age

By the end of the Neolithic period, a full-fledged civilization had developed in the Indus and

Saraswati valleys in the northern part of India.

A completely different kind of culture known as the Chalcolithic Culture had emerged in

central India and the Deccan region.

• They were contemporary of the Harappan culture, but some others were of later

Harappan age.

• In spite of using metal, they however, never reached the same level of

development.

Chalcolithic Cultures

• Chalcolithic cultures flourished in semi-arid regions of Rajasthan, MP, Gujarat, and

Maharashtra.

• Ahar culture c. 2800-1400 B.C.
• Kayatha culture c. 2250-1900 B.C.
• Malwa culture c. 1700-1400 B.C.
• Savalda culture c. 2000-1800 B.C.
• Jorwe culture c. 1400 -700 B.C.
• Prabhas culture c. 2000-1400 B.C.
• Rangpur culture c. 1700-1400 B.C.
• Chirand Culture c. 1700-750 B.C.

Kayatha Culture

• Located on the Chambal River and its tributaries.
• They were only a few in number and relatively small in size and the biggest may

not be over two hectares.

Ahar Culture

• The settlements of Ahar Culture were larger in comparison to Kayatha culture.
• Excavations revealed that they used stone, mud bricks, and mud for the

construction of houses and other structures.

• Balathal was a fortified settlement.

Malwa Culture

• Located on the Narmada and its tributaries.
• Its best known settlements are at Navdatoli, Eran, and Nagada.
• Navdatoli was one of the largest Chalcolithic settlements in the country.
• It was spread in almost 10 hectares.
• Some of these sites were fortified.
• Eran had a fortification wall with a moat.
• Nagada had a bastion of mud-bricks.

Savalda Culture

• The type site of Savalda culture is Savalda (Dhule district, Maharashtra).
• It is mostly confined to the Tapi valley but the evidence from Daimabad suggests that it

reached up to the Pravara valley.

Prabhas Culture

• Very few, not more than half a dozen settlements of Prabhas culture are known.

Rangpur Culture

• The settlements of Rangpur culture are located mostly on Ghelo and Kalubhar rivers in

Gujarat.

Jorwe Culture

• More than 200 settlements of Jorwe culture are known.
• Greater number of these settlements are found in Maharashtra.
• The best known settlements of Jorwe culture are Prakash, Daimabad, and Inamgaon.
• Daimabad was the largest one measuring almost 20 hectares.

Chirand culture

• Stone and Copper using agricultural communities have been reported from eastern India

too.

• In northern Bihar at a place called Chirand remains of an ancient village settlement have

been found.

• People lived in small houses made of bamboo and mud plaster.
• They ate rice and fish and hunted many wild animals.
• They used black and red ware pottery.
• Similar kinds of settlements have been reported from Sohagaura in Gorakhpur (U.P.) and

Sonpur in Gaya (Bihar) where people seem to have grown wheat and barley also.

• In West Bengal the sites of Pandu-Rajar-Dhibi and Mahisdal in the Burdman district have

yielded similar evidence.

• All these settlements have been dated between 1500 to 750 B.C.

Chalcolithic Economy

Agriculture

• The economy was largely based on subsistence agriculture, stock-raising, hunting, and

fishing.

• A greater part of the region in which these chalcolithic cultures flourished is the

zone of black cotton soil.

• The climate is semi-arid.
• The main crops were barley, wheat, rice, bajra, jowar, lentil, horse gram, hyacinth bean,

grass pea, pea, black gram and green gram.

• Barley was the principal cereal during this period.
• Evidence from Inamgaon suggests the practice of crop rotation, harvesting of summer

and winter crops, and artificial irrigation.

• A massive embankment was built at Inamgaon to divert the flood water through a

channel.

• Black cotton soil was ploughed for farming operations as suggested by the discovery of a

Prototype of the ploughshare made from the shoulder bone of cattle at Walki (not very

far from Inamgaon).

• Chalcolithicagriculture reflects ecological adaptation bythe people in developing

a system of dry farming, dependent on moisture retentive soils based upon then

available technology, knowledge, and means.

Animals

The excavations have revealed evidence of both domesticated as well as wild animals.

Domesticated Animals:

• Cattle, sheep, goat, dog, pig, horse.
• The bones of cattle and sheep/goat predominate at most of the sites.
• Cut and chop marks on the bones of these animals indicate that they were slaughtered

for food.

• Host of the animals were slaughtered when they were young.

Wild Animals:

• Blackbuck,fourhornedantelope,niligai,barasingha,sambar,chital, wildbuffalo,andone

horned rhinoceros.

• Bones of fish, waterfowl, turtle and rodents have also been found at some of the sites.
• Bones of marine fish species have been found at Inamgaon and the source of these fish

could be either Kalyan or Mahad, the nearest creek ports.

• Thecharredbonesofboththedomesticandwildspeciesindicatethattheywerecooked

in open fire.

Technology

• The Chalcolithic people were farmers. They had made considerable progress in ceramics

as well as metal technology.

• They used painted pottery, which was well made and well fired in a kiln.
• It was fired at a temperature between 500 - 700° C.
• Metaltoolsweremostlymadeupofcopperobtainedfrom the Khetriminesof Rajasthan.

Some of the commonly used tools were axes, chisels, bangles, beads, hooks, etc.

• Crucibles and pairs of tongs of copper found at Inamgaon illustrate the working of

goldsmiths.

• Chalcedony drills were used for perforating beads of semi precious stones.
• Limewaspreparedoutof Kankarthatwasusedforpaintinghousesandliningthestorage

bins and various other purposes.

Tools

Alltheseculturesarecharacterizedbyastoneblade/flakeindustrybasedonsiliceousstones

such as chalcedony, chert, jasper and agate.

• The tools include long parallel sided blades, blunted back blades, serrated blades, pen

knives, lutes, triangles and trapezes.

• Some of these blade tools have a shine on the sharp edge suggesting that they were used

for harvesting.

• Polished stone axes, which are typical of the Neolithic-Chalcolithic cultures of Karnataka-

Andhra, have also been found at some of these sites.

Copper objects consist of flat axes or celts with convex cutting edges, arrowheads,

spearheads, chisels, fish hooks, mid-ribbed swords, blades, bangles, rings and beads.

• At Kayatha, one pot contained 28 copper bangles.

Ornaments:

• Beads made of carnelian, jasper, chalcedony, agate, shell, etc.
• A necklace made of 40,000 microbeads of steatite has been fond in a pot belonging to

the Kayatha culture.

• At Inamgaon beads of gold and ivory, a spiral ear ring of gold and anklets of copper were

found.

Terracotta objects:

These are in the form of human and animal figurines.

The stylized terracotta bulls at Kayatha.

• Consideringtheoccurrenceofnumerousterracottabullfigurinesatseveralof Chalcolithic

sites it can be suggested that bull was a sacred animal, or may be they were just toys.

Daimabad Hoard:

• A hoard of four bronze objects
• Two Wheeled Chariot with a Rider
• a water buffalo,
• an elephant,
• a rhinoceros

Chalcolithic Pottery:

Painted pottery is the most distinguishing feature of all Chalcolithic cultures. Each of these

cultures had distinct forms of pottery

Kayatha culture:

• A sturdy red-slipped ware painted with designs in chocolate colour, a red painted buff

ware, and a combed ware bearing incised patterns.

Ahar culture:

• Unique black-and-red ware decorated with the white designs.

Prabhas and Rangpur cultures:

• Derivedfrom Harappancultureandare called Lustrous Red Warebecauseoftheirglossy

surface.

Malwa culture:

• Slightlycoarseinfabric,buthasathickbuffsurface overwhichdesignsweremadeeither

in red or black.

Jorwe culture:

• Painted black-on-red and has a matte surface treated with a wash.
• Well-known pottery forms used in this culture are −
• Dishes-on-stand,
• Spouted vases,
• Stemmed cups,
• Pedestalled bowls,
• Big storage jars, and
• Spouted basins and bowls.

Trade and Commerce

• The Chalcolithic communities traded and exchanged materials with other contemporary

communities.

• A large settlement serves as the major center of trade and exchange.
• Some of them were Ahar, Gilund, Nagada, Navdatoli, Eran, Prabhas, Rangpur,

Prakash, Daimabad, and Inamgaon.

• The Ahar people settled close to the copper source and were used to supply copper tools

and objects to other contemporary communities in Malwa and Gujarat.

• Identicalmarksembeddedonmostofthecopperaxesfoundin Malwa,Jorwe,and

Prabhas cultures that might indicate that it may be the trademarks of the smiths

who made them.

• It is found that Conch shell for bangles was traded from the Saurashtra coast to other

regions.

• Gold and ivory come to Jorwe people from Tekkalkotta in Karnataka and semiprecious

stones may have been traded to various parts from Rajpipla in Gujarat.

• Inamgaon pottery has been found at several sites located far away. This shows that the

Jorwe people used to trade even the pottery to distant places.

• Wheeled bullock carts were used for long distance trade, besides the river transport. The

drawings of wheeled bullock carts have been found on pots.

Houses and Habitations:

Rectangular and circular houses with mud walls and thatched roofs are the most common

types, though there are variations in house size from site to site.

• Ahar people built houses on plinths made of schist.
• Walls were built on these plinths with mud or mud brick and the walls were

decorated with quartz cobbles.

• Floors were made of burnt clay or clay mixed with river gravels.
• Bigger houses had partition walls, and chulhas (hearths) and quartzite saddle

querns in the kitchen.

• Malwa settlements such as those found at Navdatoli, Parkash, Daimabad and Inamgaon

were quite large.

• Evidence at Inamgaon suggests that some kind of planning was adopted in the

laying out of the settlement.

■ The majority houses were aligned in east-west orientation.

■ Though these houses were built close to each other, they had an intervening

space which might have served as a lane.

• These houses at Inamgaon were large (7 m X 5 m) rectangular structures with a

partition wall.

■ The houses had a low mud wall and gabled roof.

■ Inside the house was a large oval fire pit with raised sides for keeping the fire

under control.

• The houses at Navdatoli were provided with one or two mouthed chulhas in the

kitchen.

■ The grain was stored in deep pit silos.

• A significant feature of the Jorwe culture is the presence of a large centre in each region.
• These centres are Prakash, Daimabad and Inamgaon, respectively in the valleys of

Tapi, Godavari and Bhima.

■ The Jorwesettlementat Daimabadwasthelargest (30 hectares).Prakashand

Inamgaon cover about 5 Ha each.

• A noteworthy feature of the Jorwe settlement at Inamgaon is that:

■ the houses of the artisans such as the potter, the goldsmith, the lapidary, the

ivory-carver etc. were located on the western periphery of the principal

habitation area,

■ Whereas those of well-to-do farmers were in the central part.

■ The size of the artisans houses is smaller than those of the well-to-do.

■ Both these aspects i.e. the position and size of houses demonstrate social

differentiation in terms of a lower position for artisans in the society.

• At Inamgaon a change has been noticed in house types from Early Jorwe (1400-1000

B.C.) to Late Jorwe period (1000 - 700 B.C.):

• The Early Jowe houses were large rectangular structures with low mud walls.

■ These houses were laid out in rows with their longer axis in east-west

orientation.

■ These houses have an open space in between which might have served as a

road or lane.

• The Late Jorwe houses on the other hand depict a picture of poverty.

■ Large rectangular huts were no longer built, and instead there were small

round huts (with a low mud wall) in clusters of three or four.

■ The pit silos were replaced by a four legged storage jar.

• The overall evidence indicates that this shift from Early Jorwe to Late Jorwe was due to

decline in agriculture as a result of drop in rainfall.

• At the close of the second millennium B.C. there was a drastic climatic change in

western and central India that ledto increasingaridityforcing the people to resort

to a semi-nomadic existence.

■ Thisconclusionisbasedon calculationsofpercentagesofanimalbones found

from different phases.

■ It seems that increasing aridity during the Late Jorwe period led to the decline

of agriculture, and the economy based on farming changed over to

sheep/goat pastoralism.

Some of these chalcolithic sites have fortification walls around the settlement.

• Eran and Nagda of the Malwa Culture, and Inamgaon have a fortified mud wall with a

ditch around the habitation.

Religious Beliefs

• Religion was an important aspect that interlinked all centres of Chalcolithic cultures.
• The people of Chalcolithic cultures worshipped the mother goddess and the bull.
• In Malwa, the bull cult seems to have been predominant.
• The Mother Goddess is depicted on a huge storage jar of Malwa culture in an applique

design.

• She is surrounded by a woman on the right and a crocodile on the left, by the side

of which is represented a shrine.

• Inapainteddesignonapot,adeityisshownwithdishevelledhair,resemblingthe Rudra

of the later period.

• A painting on a jar found from Daimabad portrayed a deity surrounded by animals and

birds such as tigers and peacocks.

• It is similar to the Siva Pashupati that was found depicted on a seal from Mohenjo

Daro.

• A large number of both the naturalistic as well as stylized lingas have been found from

most of the sites.

• Twofigurines belongingto late Jorweculture foundfrom Inamgaon havebeenidentified

asproto-Ganesh,whichwasworshippedforsuccessbeforeembarkingonanunderta king.

• A large number of Fire-altars have been found from the Chalcolithic sites during the

course of excavations shows that Fire worship was a very widespread phenomenon

among the people.

• The people of Chalcolithic had a belief in life after death, which is indicated by the

existence of pots and other funerary objects found with the burials of the Malwa and

Jorwe people.

Burial Practices:

• Disposal of the dead by burial was a common custom.
• Adults as well as children were usually buried in a north-south orientation; the head

towards the north and the legs towards the south.

• Adults were, in a majority of cases, buried in an extended position, whereas children

were buried in urn-burials-either in single pots or in two pots.

• Adults, and also children, were buried in a pit which was dug into the house floor, and

rarely in the courtyard of the house.

• During the Jorwe period, in the case of adults, the portion below the ankle was purposely

chopped off.

Administrative organisation:

In thechalcolithiccultureregions,astudyofthedistributionpatternofthesites suggeststhat

these sites were of two types:

• One type representing regional centres and
• The other type representing village settlements.

This difference, or hierarchy, has been taken to suggest that some form of administrative

organisation was present in the chalcolithic cultures.

The presence of an administrative authority is further supported by existence of public

structures such as fortifications, rampart and moat, granaries, the embankment and canals

(well documented at Inamgaon) etc. found at different sites.

Conclusion

• Seeninthe larger context ofthepost-Harappandevelopments,thesechalcolithiccultures

betray discernible influences of the Harappan culture, though in a residual form.

• All the same,they are marked by strong regional elements, and also display trade

links and cultural contacts between each other.

• These metal-using farming communities which flourished in the second millennium B.C.

disappeared around the first millennium B.C. (excepting Late Jorwe which continued till

700 B.C.).

• One possible reason attributed for such a decay was increasing aridity and

unfavourable climatic conditions.

• Many of these settlements in the Godavari, Tapi and other valleys were deserted,

and were reoccupied after a gap of six or five centuries in fifth-fourth centuries

B.C., heralded by urbanisation.

Q. How can pottery be used as a source of human history during the Chalcolithic period?

Ans:

By the second millennium B.C, several regional cultures sprang up in different parts of the

Indian subcontinent. These were non-urban, non-Harappan and were characterised by the

use of stone and copper tools. These cultures are termed as Chalcolithic cultures.

The Chalcolithic cultures are identified on the basis of their geographical location, like

Ahar/Banas culture, Kayatha culture, Savalda culture, Malwa culture, Prabhas culture,

Rangpur culture and Jorwe culture.

A distinctive feature of these cultures is their painted pottery which is mostly black-on-red.

• Since the Chalcolithic cultures were part of the proto-historic age when literary traditions

were not known, the only available sources are archaeological and Pottery forms an

important component of it.

• Pottery manufacturing was an important craft and one of the characteristic features of

the Chalcolithic period is a well-developed ceramic industry, including fine-painted, plain

and coarse pottery for a variety of purposes.

In the following ways, Chalcolithic pottery can be used as a source of history of human

during the Chalcolithic period:

• Technological advancement in the fields of pottery manufacturing - The Chalcolithic

pottery is both wheel-made and well fired.

• It also shows the use of inverted firing technique in pottery which was black from

inside and red from outside.

• There is also handmade pottery
• Use of different colours - The pottery has geometrical designs and motifs of various

colours which shows their aesthetic sense, knowledge of natural rocks like haematite and

how to make colour out of them.

• Variety of Pottery - Different types of pottery of varying sizes and designs have been

foundlike Dishes-on-stand,spoutedvases,spoutedcups,pedestalledbowls,bigstorage

jars and spouted basins and bowls which provide information about their lifestyle.

• For example - Big storage jars indicate they might be used for storing food grains

which point towards agricultural surplus,

• Perforated jars might have been used for making wines.
• Jars with a narrow neck might have been used for storing water.
• Pottery associated with burial - Grave goods in pots have been found at a number of

burial sites which indicate a belief in next birth as well as the beginning of social

inequalities.

• Influence of Harappan civilization - Prabhas and Rangpur pottery clearly shows the

influence of Harappan pottery which is reflected in their glossy surface.

• Trade in Pottery - Inamgaon pottery has been found at several sites located far away.

This shows that the Jorwe people used to trade even the pottery to distant places.

• Paintings were drawn on Pottery:
• Paintings of Sun and mother goddess may reflect their religious belief
• Paintings of birds like peacocks and animals like bulls, antelopes, etc. along with

bows, arrows provide evidence of hunting and painting of fish indicate the

prevalence of fishery for subsistence.

• Paintings of cattle along with dogs may be associated with their domestication.
• Paintings of the boat may reflect its use as a mode of transport or use for long-

distance trade.

• In addition,Variousgeometricaldesignslike triangles,dots,and circles,diamonds,

hooks, stylized 'S' motifs, along with wavy lines, straight lines, broad thick bands

as borders shows the advanced aesthetic sense of the Chalcolithic people.

However, there are also limitations of using Chalcolithic Pottery as a source for discerning

culture and lifestyle of Chalcolithic period as -

• Chalcolithic Pottery only reflects the material culture and that too in parts rather than

presenting the whole picture.

• Further, the various uses of pottery as suggested above are one of the several

interpretations and need to be corroborated with other sources.

• The interpretations of paintings on pottery like Sun motifs, mother goddess etc may be

speculations rather than the actual beliefs of the Chalcolithic people.

On the whole, the Chalcolithic pottery provides us an insight into the history of the proto-

historic Chalcolithic cultures. But the Chalcolithic Pottery needs to be studied along with

other archaeological sources like various tools, implements, settlement patterns, burial

practices, etc. to provide a convincing picture of the lifestyle and culture of the Chalcolithic

people.

Q. The emergence of Non-Harappan Chalcolithic cultures in Central India and the Deccan

mark a change not only in the subsistence pattern of people but an overall transition from

pre to proto historic period. Critically analyse.

Ans:

By the second millennium B.C, several regional cultures sprang up in different parts of the

Indian subcontinent. These were non-urban, non-Harappan and were characterised by the

use of stone and copper tools. These cultures are termed as Chalcolithic cultures.

The Non-Harappan Chalcolithic cultures of Central India and Deccan include Kayatha culture,

Savalda culture, Malwa culture, and Jorwe culture.

How these cultures marked a change in the subsistence pattern of people -

• The Chalcolithic people domesticated animals and cultivated food grains rather than

solely relying on hunting and gathering.

• Agriculture was quite advanced as people were aware of irrigation and crop rotation.
• They produced wheat and rice.
• In addition to these staple crops, they also cultivated bajra and several pulses like

lentil, black gram, green gram and grass pea.

• All these food grains have been found at Navdatoli.
• They also kept cows, sheep, goats, pigs, and buffaloes and hunted deer.
• Cotton was produced in the black cotton soil of the Deccan.

How these cultures marked a transition from pre to protohistoric period

• Beginning of settled life - Chalcolithic People founded the first large ruralsettlements on

the river banks and near the hills rather than living a nomadic life.

• Beginning of the use of metal like Copper tools along with microliths and other stone

tools. They knew the art of copper smelting and copper metallurgy.

• Fortified settlements - The settlements at Kayatha and Eran in Madhya Pradesh and at

Inamgaon in Western Maharashtra were fortified which marks a new beginning.

• Chalcolithic communities were well acquainted with the art of pottery making.
• Considering the pre-bronze phase of their development,they were the first to use

painted pottery.

• They made both wheel turned pottery as well as handmade pottery.
• Their pots were meant for cooking, eating, drinking and storing.
• Paintings were drawn on Pottery:
• Paintings of Sun and mother goddess may reflect their religious belief
• Paintings of birds like peacocks and animals like bulls, antelopes, etc. along with

bows, arrows provide evidence of hunting and painting of fish indicate the

prevalence of fishery for subsistence.

• Paintings of cattle along with dogs may be associated with their domestication.
• Paintings of the boat may reflect its use as a mode of transport or use for long-

distance trade.

• In addition,Variousgeometricaldesignslike triangles,dots,and circles,diamonds,

hooks, stylized 'S' motifs, along with wavy lines, straight lines, broad thick bands

as borders shows the advanced aesthetic sense of the Chalcolithic people.

However, there were also a number of limitations associated with the Chalcolithic cultures

which are as follows-

• The general weakness of these Chalcolithic cultures is evident from the burial of a large

number of children in western Maharashtra which indicates high infant mortality.

• This shows that the chalcolithic social and economic pattern did not promote

longevity.

• The Chalcolithic culture had an essentially rural background.
• During this period, the supply of copper was limited and as a metal copper had its

limitations.

• In addition, people did not know the art of mixing tin with copper to form bronze

which formed the basis for the rise of the earliest civilizations in Egypt, Crete and

Mesopotamia.

• The Chalcolithic people did not know the art of writing nor did they live in the cities.
• Although most chalcolithic cultures were younger than the Indus valley civilization, they

did not derive any substantial benefits from the advanced technological knowledge of

the Indus people.

Thus it can be concluded that although the Chalcolithic culture marked an overall transition

from prehistoric to protohistoric, it also had a number of limitations.