Megalithic Cultures

Defining Megalith

• The term 'megalith' is derived from Greek 'megas', which means great and 'lithos'

meaning stone. So, 'megaliths' refer to the monuments built of large stones.

• But all monuments constructed of big stones are not megaliths.
• The term has a restricted usage and is applied only to a particular class of

monuments or structures, which are built of large stones and have some

sepulchral (grave like), commemorative or ritualistic association except the

hero stones or memorial stones.

• The megaliths usually refer to the burials made of large stones in graveyards

away from the habitation area.

Chronology

• Based on archaeological evidence (first on the basis of Brahmagiri excavation, dating

the megaliths on the basis of a characteristic ceramic (pottery) type - the Black and

Red Ware (BRW), which is available in all types of megaliths in South India, these

cultures are placed between the 3 rd c. B.C and the 1 st c. A.D.

• But, Megalithic culture of South India had a much larger chronological span.
• The problem in ascertaining the chronological span of the megalithic cultures in South

India lies in the fact that only a few radiocarbon dates are so far available from

megalithic habitations.

• The habitations site at Hallur gave a date of 1000 B.C for the earliest phase of

thesecultures.Thisphase iscorrelated withthe graves at Tadakanahalli,4 kms

away from this site.

• Two radiocarbon dates for the sites at Naikund and Takalghat place Vidarbha

megaliths in circa 600 B.C.

• In Tamilnadu, Paiyampalli recorded a date of circa 4 th c. B.C.
• On the basis of explorations and excavations, the date of the megaliths is pushed in

the North Karnataka region as early as 1200 B.C.

• As the megalithic culture overlapped with the end phases of neolithic-chalcolithic

culture,itisfoundinassociationwithneolithic-chalcolithicwaresatthelowerend and

with the rouletted ware (the first millennium AD) at the upper end.

• On this basis the time bracket of the megalithic cultures in South India may be placed

between 1000 B.C and A.D 100.

• However, the available archaeological data suggests that the period of their

maximum popularity lies somewhere between 600 B.C and A.D 100.

Origin and Spread of Megalithic Cultures

• In the context of India, it has been suggested that this culture arrived with the

Dravidian speakers who came to South India from west Asia by sea.

• But we find that the typical West Asian megaliths yielded the bronze objects

and this culture came to an end in the last phase of their Bronze Age around

1500 B.C.

• The Indian megaliths, on the other hand, belong to the Iron Age generally

dated to 1000 B.C onwards.

• It is yet not certain when and how iron technology developed and became an

integral part of the megalithic culture.

• The material and chronological differences between the megalithic culture of

northern India and southern India suggest that the coming of this culture into the

Indian subcontinent would have taken place by two routes by the two different

groups -

• one following the sea route from the Gulf of Oman to the West coast of India

and the other following the land route from Iran.

• Thecomplexpatternofwidelydifferentburialpracticesthatarealllumpedtogether

under the term 'megaliths' is the result of mingling of various traditions and

developments during a long period.

• These megaliths have been found in different chronological contexts practically all

over India, from

• the plains of Punjab, Indo-Gangetic basin,
• the desert of Rajasthan,
• northern part of Gujarat and
• all regions south of Nagpur in the Peninsular India.
• It survives as a living tradition in the north-eastern part of India and in the

Nilgiris.

• Themainconcentrationofthemegalithicculturesin Indiawasthe Deccan,especially

south of the river Godavari.

• However, large-stone structures resembling some of the usual megalith types have

also beenreportedfromsomeplacesin North India, Central Indiaand Western India.

These include -

• Seraikala in Bihar;
• Deodhoora in Almora district and
• Khera near Fatehpur Sikri of Uttar Pradesh;
• Nagpur;
• Chanda and Bhandra districts of Madhya Pradesh;
• Deosa, near Jaipur in Rajasthan.
• Similar monuments or structures are also found
• near Karachi in Pakistan,
• near Leh in the Himalayas and
• at Burzahom in Jammu and Kashmir.
• However, their wide distribution in the southern region of India suggests that it was

essentially a South Indian feature which flourished at least for a thousand years.

• Sepulchral megaliths:
• The sepulchral (containing remains of the dead) megaliths can store the

remains of the dead in a variety of forms.

• They could be primary burials, in which case the dead is interned soon after

his or her death and it will contain a complete skeleton with some additional

material as homage to the dead for the dead to use in afterlife.

■ In some cases, these primary burials may also be in a sarcophagus

made of terracotta. The whole chamber of burial therefore is a rich

source of information.

• Secondary burials are also common when the remains of the dead, essentially

the bones, are put in urns or pits.

■ The location of the dead is most often marked with stone circles but

Cairns and slab circles are also found on the surface.

Megalithic Culture - The Iron Age Culture of South India

• Mostoftheinformation about the iron age in South India comesfrom theexcavations

of the megalithic burials. The megalithic culture in South India was a full fledged iron

age culture.

• Hence, stone dropped out of use as a material for weapons and tools but

found alternate use.

• Iron objectshavebeenfounduniversallyin allthemegalithicsitesright from Junapani

near Nagpur in Vidarbha region (Central India) down to Adichanallur in Tamilnadu in

the far south.

• With the introduction ofiron there wasa gradualchange in almost everything except

perhaps the house plans.

• But,ofallthesechangesthemostremarkablewastheelaboratemethodofdisposing

the dead. This became a characteristic feature of the South Indian regions.

• Instead of laying the dead accompanied by four or five pots in a pit in the

house, now the dead were buried in a separate place - a cemetery or a

graveyard away from the house.

• Theremainsofthedeadwerecollectedperhapsafterexposingthebody for sometime

and then the bones were placed underground in a specially prepared stone box called

a cist.

• The cists were elaborate structures and must have necessitated an amount of

planningandcooperation amongthecommunityandtheexistenceof masons

and other craftsmen capable of manufacturing the required size of stones,

large and small.

• It is probable that these megaliths must have been planned and kept ready

before the death of an individual.

Classification of the Megaliths

• The megalithic burials show a variety of methods for the disposal of the dead.

Moreover, there are megaliths which are internally different but exhibit the same

external features.

• The megaliths can be classified under different categories:
• Rock Cut Caves,
• Hood Stones and Hat Stones / Cap Stones
• Menhirs, Alignments and Avenues
• Dolmenoid Cists
• Cairn Circles
• Stone Circles,
• Pit Burials, and
• Barrows

(1) Rock Cut Caves:

• These are scooped out on soft laterite, as found in the southern part of the West

Coast. These rock cut cave tombs are peculiar to this region and occur in the Cochin

and Malabar regions of Kerala.

The laterite rocks cut caves of the burial site constitute three chambers.

• They also occur in other regions. On the East Coast of South India, they are present in

Mamallapuram near Madras.

• These rock cut burial caves in Cochin region are of four types - (i) Caves with Central

pillar, (ii) Caves without central pillar, (iii) Caves with a deep opening and (iv) Multi-

chambered caves.

(2) Hood Stones (Kudaikallu) and Cap Stones (Toppikkals)

• Allied with the rock cut caves but of a simpler form are the Hood stones or Kudaikallu

mostly found in Kerala.

• These consists of a dome-shaped dressed laterite block which cover the

underground circular pit cut into a natural rock and provided with a stairway.

• In some cases the hood stone gives placeto a capstone or toppikkal, which is a plano-

convex slab resting on three or four quadrilateral boulders.

• Thisalsocoversanundergroundburialpitcontainingthefuneraryurnandothergrave

furnishings.

• Unlike as in the rock cut caves, there is no chamber apart from this open pit in which

itself the burial is made.

• Usually, it contains a burial urn covered with a convex or dome-shaped pottery lidor a

stone slab and contains skeletal remains, small pots and, sometimes ashes.

Toppikkal in Kerala

• Similar monuments are commonly encountered in Cochin and Malabar regions

extending along the Western Ghats into the Coimbatore region upto the Noyyal river

valley in Tamilnadu.

(3) Menhirs, Alignments and Avenues:

• Menhirs are monolithic pillars planted vertically into the ground. These may be small

or gigantic in height.

Menhir Megalith in Hazaribagh, Jharkhand

• They are dressed or not dressed at all.
• These are essentially commemorative stone pillars set up at or near a burial spot.
• These menhirs are mentioned in ancient Tamil literature as nadukal and are often

called Pandukkalor Pandil.

• In some cases, the menhirs are not planted in ground but rest on the original ground

propped up with a mass of rubble as at Maski.

• These occur in a number of sites in close vicinity of other type of megalithic burials,

mostly in different regions of Kerala and Bellary, Raichur and Gulbarga regions of

Karnataka in large numbers, but less frequently at other places of South India.

Mizoram's first 'monument'- The menhirs of Vangchhia village, Champai district of Mizoram.

The actual site where the 171 menhirs stand is known as Kawtchhuah Ropui, meaning the

Great Entranceway. Menhirs or monoliths are found in Meghalaya, Nagaland and Andhra

Pradesh but are not common in the rest of India.

• Alignments are closely associated to the menhirs.
• These consists of a series of standing stones.
• These stones are sometimes dressed.
• The alignments are found at Komalaparathala in Kerala and at a number of

sitesin Gulbarga,Raichur,Nalgondaand Mahboobnagardistrictsof Karnataka.

Menhir in Manipur

• Avenues consists of two or more parallel rows of the alignments and hence many of

the sites under alignments, may be considered as examples of this category of

monuments when they are in parallel lines.

(4) Dolmenoid Cists:

• Dolmenoid cists consists of square or rectangular box-like graves built of several

orthostats (upright stone or slab) one or more for each side, supporting the super

incumbent capstone consisting of one or more stones, often with the floor also paved

with the stone slabs.

• The orthostats and the capstones might be formed either of undressed rough blocks

of stone or partly dressed stones.

• The dolmenoid cists occur at large number at Sanur near Chingleput (T.N.) and many

other sites in this region.

• The cists built of dressed slabs or the slab cists are the normal type of cists, occurring

all over South India, as also in some parts of the north.

Dolmens of Marayur. Marayur in Kerala is also famous for Ancient rock paintings.

• There are many sub-types of this in Tamilnadu:
• Dolmenoid cist with multiple orthostats,
• Dolmenoid cist with four orthostats with U-shaped port-hole in the east or

west,

• Dolmenoidcistwithfourorthostats with U-shapedport-holeonthetopcorner

of the eastern orthostat, and

• Dolemnoid cist with four orthostats with slab-circles.

A Munda dolmen with a table top capstone in Jharkhand

(5) Cairn Circles:

• Cairn circles are one the most popular type of megalithic monuments occurring all

over south India in association with other types.

• They consist of a heap of stone rubble enclosed within a circle of boulders.

Megalithic burial sites (cairn-circles), discovered near Veeranam in Tiruvannamalai district,

canbedatedto 1,000 BCE-300 CE.Thegraniteslabsofthedolmenoidcistsarestrewnaround.

• The pit burials under the cairn circles consist of deep pits dug into the soil, roughly

circular, square or oblong on plan.

• Theskeletalremainsandthegravefurniturewereplacedonthefloorsof these

pits.

• The pits were then filled up with earth.
• Above this earth filling was placed the cairn heap which might be just a thin layer or

may rise upto 3 to 4 ft. above the ground level and bounded by a circle of stones.

• Such pit burials have been found at many sites in the Chingleput (Tamilnadu),

Chitradurg and Gulbarga (Karnataka) districts.

• A sarcophagus is literally a legged coffin made of terracotta.
• The cairn circles containing sarcophagi entombments are comparatively more

widespread than the pit burials.

• They are similar to the pit burials but the skeletal remains and the primary

depositsofthegravefurnitureareplacedinanoblongterracottasarcophagus.

• This sarcophagus is generally provided with a convex terracotta lid, rows of

legs at the bottom and often with a capstone at a higher level.

■ Such megalithic structures are found from:

■ South Arcot, Chingleput and North Arcot districts of Tamilandu, Kolar

district of Karnataka

Sarcophagus unearthed from Pallavaram in Kancheepuram district

• The urn burials under the cairn circles are a variant form of the sarcophagi burials and

occur in large number in most parts of South India.

• The urns, (a pot) in which the burials are made, are deposited in pits dug into

the soil.

• The pits are filled up with the soil upto the ground level and are frequently

provided with a capstone.

• Then, the heap of cairns on the surface, which marks the burial, is surrounded

by a circle of stones.

• They are predominant in:

■ Kerala

■ Madurai, Tiruchirapalli, Coimbatore, Nilgiris, Salem, Chingleput and

South Arcot district of Tamilnadu;

■ Kolar, Banglore, Hassan, Chitradurg, Bellary, Raichurand Gulbarga

districts of Karnataka;

■ various districts of Andhra Pradesh and

■ the region around Nagpur.

The urn in the foreground, found at Adichanallur, resembles burial urns found at Malwa in

Madhya Pradesh, suggesting trade contacts between the two regions.

(6) Stone Circles

• They are the most commonly encountered megalithic monuments in India.
• They reflect the features of various forms of megalithic monuments such as the

Kudaikallu, Topikkal, different types of pit burials, menhirs, dolmenoid cists of

different types, cairns, etc. These occur from the southern tip of the peninsula upto

Nagpur region and in different parts of North India.

• But in this category under consideration, only stone circles without any

considerablecairnfillingwithinthecircle,containingburialpitswithor without

urns or sarcophagi, are included.

(7) Pit Burials:

• Burials in pyriform or fuciform urns a large conical jars containing the funerary

deposits, are buried in the underground pits specially dug for the purpose into the

hard natural soil and sometimes into the basal rock and the pits are filled up.

• In these kinds of burials we do not find any surface indication of the burial in the form

of a stone circle, cairn heap, hood stone or hat (cap) stone, or even a menhir.

• These urn burials are without any megalithic appendage.
• This class of megalithic burials cannot be included under the megalithic burial

monuments, because no megalithic is observed in relation to them.

• But they exhibit the general traits of the megalithic culture of South India,

characterized by the use of the typically megalithic Black-and-red ware (BRW)

and associated wares with iron objects.

• These grave goods are identical with their counterparts found in the regular

megalithic burials.

• Moreover,theseoccurinthegeneralareaswherethetypicalmegalithicburials

exist.

• In fact, these urn burials do not differ in any detail from the urn burials under

a stone or cairn circle of the megalithic order, except for the surface features.

• These urn burialswithout megalithicappendage are found in many sites of Tamilnadu

like Adichanallur, Gopalasamiparambu and scores of other sites.

• However, these occur less abundantly in Karnataka and Andhra regions.
• Even in North India, these urn burials are frequently observed at a number of

Harappan and the Later Chalcolithic sites in Western, Central and North-

western India, but their context is completely different from the South Indian

urn burials.

An urn burial in Adichanallur containing skeletons, covered with another urn in what is called

a twin- pot system. It shows the care with which the dead were buried

(8) Barrows

• Thebarrowsorearthenmoundsmarkofftheundergroundburials.Theymaybeeither

a circular barrow, oblong on plan, a long barrow.

• They have or may not have the surrounding stone circles or ditches.
• Monumentsofthiskindhavenotbeenfoundinlargenumbersin India.However,such

monuments have been observed in the Hassan district of Karnataka.

Grave Goods in Megalithic Burials

• The megalithic burials have yielded a variety of objects, which prove to be very

important in the study of megalithic culture.

• It is observed that right from the Later Palaeolithic period, an intentional burial was

accorded to the dead.

• Themegalithicpeoplewerenoexceptiontotheage-oldcustomand,therefore

took pains to construct elaborate and labour-consuming tombs.

• They furnished them with as many essential objects as they could afford.
• They thought this practice to be necessary as they believed in the after-life of

the dead.

• And so, the dead were suitably provided for a place to live in with goods of

their essential needs.

• In the Indian megalithic especially those in South India, the grave furniture consisted

of:

• a large variety of pottery;
• weapons and implements mostly of iron but often of stone or copper;
• ornaments like beads of terracotta, semi-precious stones, gold or copper,

shell, etc., strung into necklaces or rarely the ear or nose ornaments, armlets

or bracelets and diadems;

• food as indicated by the presence of paddy husk and chaff, and some other

cereals;

• animals, as indicated by skeletal remains, sometimes complete, in these

graves.

Subsistence Pattern

• Megalithic sites were initially understood as settlements of nomadic pastoralists.
• However, the evidence clearly indicates that earlyiron age communities in the

far south lived on a combination of agriculture, hunting, fishing, and animal

husbandry.

• There is also evidence of well-developed craft traditions.
• These features, along with the megalithic monuments themselves, suggest

sedentary living.

(1) Agriculture:

• The basis of their economy was agriculture.
• In fact, the megalith builders were responsible for the introduction of

advanced methods of agriculture on a large scale, based on irrigation.

• They introduced the 'tank-irrigation' in South India and thus brought a

revolutionary change in the agricultural system.

• People grew cereals, millets, and pulses.
• Charred grains of horse gram, green gram, and possibly ragi were found at

Paiyampalli.

• Rice, an essentially irrigational crop, served as their staple food.

■ Paddy husks and rarely paddy grains are reported from a number of

excavated graves from all over the region.

■ Rice as attested by the Sangam literature, is the staple food of the

people of South India since very early times and remains till today.

• Rice husk occurred at Coorg and Khapa (in Karnataka), and Hallur yielded

charred grains of ragi.

• Rice grains were found in one of the tombs at Kunnatur (in Tamil Nadu).
• Naturally, there were some regional variations in the crops grown.
• Pestles and grinding stones have been found at some megalithic sites. For instance, a

granite grinding stone was found in a cist at Machad (in Kerala).

• The location of megalithic sites on unproductive land was more than a coincidence.

These highly intelligent and pragmatic communities saw to it that fertile arable lands

were not wasted due to encroachments by their graves.

• Unproductive foot-hills, rocky and gravelly lands were used for the location

of their graves, while lower down, the plains were reserved for agricultural

purposes.

• But some communities seem to have considered that the spirit of their dead

ancestors would guard and bestow prosperity on their fields.

• Hence, massive though empty dolmens are located in the midst of their fields,

as at Uthiramerur in Tamilnadu.

(2) Pastoralism and Animal Husbandry:

• The frequent occurrence of animal bones--of both wild and domesticated species--

indicates domestication and hunting.

• The cattle, sheep, goat, dog, pig, horse, buffalo, fowl, ass etc. were among the

domesticated animals.

• Cattle (including buffalo) were the most important domesticated animal. This brings

out two important facts.

• First, the earlier neolithic tradition of cattle keeping was continued.
• Second, cattle pastoralism and not sheep/goat pastoralism, formed a major

preoccupation of megalithic society.

• The occurrence of the remains of domesticated pig and fowl suggests pig rearing and

poultry farming on a small scale at many of the sites.

(3) Hunting and Fishing:

• Hunting naturally augmented the food supply, as the equipment for hunting, like

arrowheads, spears and javelins would indicate.

• Sling was probably another equipment used for hunting by megalithic people,

as attested by the large-scale findings of stone balls.

• The occurrence of skeletal remains of wild fauna like Wild boar, Hyena, Barking deer,

Chousingha, Sambar, Chital, Nilgai, Peacock, Leopard, Tiger, Cheetah, Sloth bear, Wild

hog, Peafowl, Jungle fowl, Water fowl, etc. from different sites indicate that these

species were hunted and formed part of their dietary system.

• Paintings:
• Some clues to subsistence practice of hunting come from paintings and

figurines. Hunting scenes are depicted at Marayur and Attala (in Kerala).

• At Hire Benkal (in Karnataka), there are scenes of hunting, showing peahens,

peacocks, stags, and antelopes, as well as scenes of people dancing in groups.

• Fishing:
• The evidence in the form of terracotta net sinkers from Takalghat and fish-

hooks from Khapa and Tangal besides the actual skeletal remains of fish from

Yelleshwaram reflect that fishing was also practised.

• Fish-hooks have been found in some megalithic graves in Tamil Nadu.

(4) Technology: Industries and Crafts

• The megalithic sites of South India give evidence of well-developed traditions of

specialized crafts.

• The industrial activities such as smithery, carpentry, pottery making, lapidary (art of

working with precious stone), basketry and stone cutting formed other economic

activities of megalithic society.

(a) Metals:

• There are many megalithic sites which were the production sites of metals like iron,

copper, gold, silver etc.

• Smelting:
• The archaeological evidence in the form of crucibles, smelting-furnaces, clay

tuyers andpresence ofmaterial like iron orepieces, iron slag, copper slag and

traces of copper or gold mines or other mineral resources at or near to these

sites is suggestive of smithery.

■ There is evidence of local smelting of iron at Paiyampalli (Karnataka).

• An efficient utilisation of metallic resources is dependent upon availability of

fuelandtypeoffuelcapableofproducingtherequireddegreeoftemperature.

■ The most common type of fuel used by these pre-industrial smelters

were charcoal, wood, dung and paddy husk.

• The available archaeological evidence indicates the utilisation of metal implements

such as axes, plough shares, hoes, sickles, spades, etc.

• The use of axes was either for cutting logs or for clearing forests.
• The use of hoe (or bladed harrow) for cultivation has been recorded at many

sites.

• Theuseofploughshare from manysitesamplyattesttothetechnologicalbase

of megalithic people for carrying out the agricultural operations.

• Iron:
• Ironobjectsgenerallyoutnumberobjects madeof other metalsat megalithic

sites.

• The large volume and variety of iron artefacts which indicate the metal's

widespread use in everyday life.

■ utensils,

■ Weapons (arrowheads, spearheads, swords, knives, etc.),

■ carpentry tools (axes, chisels, adzes), and

■ Agricultural implements (sickles, hoes, coulters--the vertical blade

fixed in front of a ploughshare).

• These objects reflect that agriculture was their primary occupation as a large

number of iron tools necessary for agricultural activities are found at different

sites.

• Other more elaborate objects found in burials may have had ritualistic

functions.

• The rich variety of iron objects enables us to understand the aspects of their

economy and their way of life to a large extent.

• Copper, bronze, gold silver:
• There are copper and bronze artefacts such as utensils, bowls, and bangles; a

few silver and gold ornaments also occur.

• Copper was used for the production of vessels and ornaments.
• Though Adichannallur burials and Nilgiris yielded bronze objects the use of

bronze at these two sites are exceptions.

• Ornaments were also made of gold.
• The use of silver was rather scarce.
• Different sorts of metallurgical techniques were used in the manufacture of metal

artefacts.

• Some of the copper and bronze objects were evidently cast in moulds, others

were hammered into shape.

• Some communities knew how to alloy metals.

(b) Woodcraft / Carpentry:

• The evidence shows that the axes, chisels, wedges, adzes, anvil, borers, hammer

stones, etc., formed the main tool-kit for working on the wood.

• The archaeo-botanical evidence shows that plant species like Acacia, Pinus, Brassica,

Stellaria, Teak, Satinwood etc. were already known to these communities.

• The use of wooden plough for cultivation cannot be set aside. Even now, the tillage

implement common in black cotton soil tracts, is the wooden plough.

• Wood was also used for posts in the construction of huts with thatched or reed roofs

supported on wooden posts.

• Post-holes are observed at Brahmagiri and Maski indicating the presence of

timber construction for domestic buildings.

• There was an advanced stage of wooden architecture involvingdressingof wood and

creating different types of mortises and tenons.

• The common occurrence of these items suggests ample use of wood for

construction and many other purposes.

(c) Ceramics (Pottery):

• The ceramic fabrics associated with the megalithic culture are
• Black-and-Red Ware (BRW),

■ BRW,whichisawheel-turnedpottery,consistsofutilitarianshapes and

a majority of the forms probably served as tableware of megalithic

society.

• The prominent shapes encountered in this ware are varieties of

bowls, dishes, lids or covers, vases, basins, legged jars and

channel-spouted vessels.

• Burnished Black Ware,

■ The burnished black ware, which isalso wheel-turned,comprises some

prominent shapes such as elongated vases, tulip-shaped lids, funnel-

shapedlids,goblets,spoutedvessels,circularring-stands,knobbedand

rimmed lids with bird or animal finials.

• Red Ware,

■ In red ware the shapes are utilitarian which include legged vessels,

double knobbed lids, ring-stands, dough plates and vases.

• Micaceous Red Ware,

■ The micaceous red ware exhibits typical shapes like pots with globular

bodyand funnel-shapedmouth,doughplates andbasins.Decoration in

the form of cording, applique and painted designs have also been

noticed.

• Grey Ware,
• Russet Coated Painted Ware (RCPW)

■ Of all the types, the most attractive are the RCPW with wavy lines and

other decorations. They are occasionally bearing post-firing graffiti.

Russet-coated jars are recovered from several sites.

• Some pots with lids with decorated finials in the shape of birds or animals appear to

be ceremonial wares.

• All these varieties of pottery are characterised by a fine fabric and are produced from

well levigated clay rarely with sand or such gritty material. They were well fired in

open kilns at low temperature.

• The evidence of pottery kilns from sites, such as Polakonda and Beltada Banahalli

can be taken as supportive evidence for the practice of this craft.

• The technical efficiency evident in the preparation of these ceramics or potteries

might hint at a professional class of potters and pottery making as one of the

important economic activities.

(d) Miscellaneous (Bead making, Mat weaving, Stone cutting, Terracotta making, Rock art,

etc.):

• Bead making.
• A number of objects ranging from single terracotta beads to very finely

manufactured gold ornaments were used by the megalithic folk for their

personal decoration.

• Grave goods included etched carnelian beads and of other material as well.
• The evidence of the bead making industry attested at two megalithic sites -

Mahurjhari and Kodumanal, are suggestive of the practice of this craft.

• The availability of a large variety of beads show that agate, carnelian,

chalcedony, feldspar, coral, crystal, garnet, jasper, tremolite, magnesite,

faience, paste martz, serpentine, shell, steatite, amethyst and terracotta were

utilised in the preparation of beads of different exquisite shapes.

• Apartfromtheuseofsemi-preciousstones,someoftheshapeshavealso been

worked on precious metals like gold, shell, horn, bone and glass.

• Mat weaving:
• The mat impressions left on the base of jars at sites like Managondanahalli

and Nagarjunakonda indicate that the art of mat-weaving was practised.

• Stone cutting:
• The activity of stone-cutting is attested by:

■ the chisel impressions noticed at Borgaon Khurd (Maharashtra) on a

stone trough,

■ excellent laterite cutting evidenced in rock-cut chamber tombs of

Kerala region,

■ chamber tombs in North Karnataka and

■ the occurrence of domestic stone artefacts such as pestles, mortars,

saddle querns, etc., at many megalithic sites.

• Toy:
• Terracotta discs, figurines, gamesmen, miniature pottery vessels found from

graves attest their use as toys for entertainment of children.

• Painting:
• Theengravingsandpaintingsonthemegalithsinpeninsular India,provesthat

these megalith builders were the authors of these paintings.

• There is evidence in Sangam literature also, of the erection of burial stones

with paintings as well as writings.

• Thus, we can say that the megalithic people practised many other craft industries

apart from highly specialised agro-pastoral economy. The divergent economic

patterns, which seem to have prevailed then, were not isolated but had a symbiotic

relationship with each other.

Trade and Exchange Network:

• Some megalithic sites must have been centres of craft production linked to networks

of exchange.

• This is suggested by the location of several large megalithic settlements on

the trade routes of the early historical period.

• The excavations have yielded various non-local items among the grave goods which

reflect that there were exchange activities during the megalithic period.

• Carnelian beads reported from coastal sites, which werepoints of exchange in

ancient times.

• The availability of bronze suggests the arrivals of copper and an alloy, either

tin or arsenic, from somewhere.

• From the Graeco-Roman writings and the Tamil texts it is clear that at a little

later period maritime exchange was the major source for procuring them.

• The archaeological remains like rouletted ware, amphora and other ceramic

materials found at many sites like those at Arikamedu are evidence for this.

• Inter-regional and intra-regional exchange of goods were fairly well

established in South India by the 3 rd c. B.C.

• Regionalvariationintheproductionofcommoditiesandthenon-availabilityof local

raw materials/finished goods had resulted in long-distance transactions under the

initiative of the long-distance traders from the Gangetic region as well as the

overseas world.

• Theexchangenetworkwhichwasinanincipientstateduringtheearlyironage

expanded over the centuries as a result of internal dynamics and external

impetus involving the demand for goods in other parts of the subcontinent as

well as the Mediterranean region.

• It was a network across land and seas with long-distance traders in the middle

and unevenly developed people at either side.

Social Organisation and Settlement Pattern

• It is not archaeology but anthropology, which provides us evidence to assume the

possibility of production relations transcending clan and kinship ties in such remote

periods of tribal descent groups.

• They point to the material culture of diverse forms of subsistence such as

hunting/ gathering and shifting cultivation besides the production of a few

craft-goods.

• The variations observed in the external and internal features of the burials reflect

that the Iron Age society of the megalithic people was not a homogenous entity.

• Some of the relatively huge burial types are suggestive of status differentiation and

ranking of the buried individuals.

• Differences in the types and contents of the burials suggest that there was

some sort of disparity in the attributes of the buried individuals.

• The number of more elaborate burials like the multi-chambered rock-cut

tombs at many sites, arelimited. Moreover, these have yielded rare artefacts

made of bronze or gold.

■ On the other hand, many of the burials are simple urn burials with a

very few artefacts.

• The variety, high quality and fineness of ceramic goods in huge burials

including the elaborate urn burials, are also suggestive of the difference in

social status.

■ An individual's treatment after death bears some predictable

relationship to the individual's state in life and to the organisation of

the society to which the individual belonged.

• The megalithic people lived in villages consisting of sizable populations.
• Though they had a bias for urban life, they were slow in building huge cities

like their contemporaries in the Gangetic Valley.

• Thelargesizeof thepopulation isindicated bytheorganised mass of manual

labour that wasavailable for transportingandhousingmassiveblocksof stone

in the construction of cists, dolmens and other types of megaliths, or in

erectinglarge rubble andearthenmoundsacross the watercourses for storing

up rain waters for irrigation purposes.

• Thelargesizeofpopulationisfurtherattestedbythefact that extensiveburial

groundswithnumerousgraves,manyofthemcontainingtheremainsof more

than one individual, and occasionally of as many as 20 or more individuals,

have been found.

• Houses:
• The houses in which the megalithic people lived probably consisted of huts

with thatched or reed roofs, supported on wooden posts as indicated by the

presence of post-holes in the excavated sites.

• Post-holes were found at Brahmagiri and Maski indicating the presence of

timber construction for ordinary buildings.

• Distribution of settlements:
• An increase in the size and number of settlements during the megalithic

period from the preceding neolithic/chalcolithic phase and growing use of

different metallic resources were certainly not independent developments.

• This can be observed in the effect of the spread of plough cultivation which

produced major alterations in the structure and distribution of settlements.

• An analysis on the locational context and the distribution patterns of these

sites stronglyindicates agrowing inclination towards intensive-field cropping

methods.

• The maximum concentration of sites in river valleys and basins and

preference shown towards occupying black soil, red sandy-loamy soil zones

also supports this contention.

• The distribution pattern of these sites in rainfall zones where the average

annual precipitation is 600-1500 mm, also hints to the same conclusion.

• Village transhumance was present, as attested to by the location of most of

the settlements on the banks of rivers and that of most of the burial sites

within a distance of 10-20 km from major water resources.

Religious Beliefs and Practices

• The elaborate architecture of their graves,the gravegoodsand other metaland stone

objects throw light on the religious beliefs of megalithic people.

• Cult of dead:
• The megalithic people had great veneration for the dead as they

constructed these monuments with great effort and devotion.

• They believed that the dead had a life after death and the living had to

provide them with their necessities.

■ The grave goods indicate that they belonged to the dead man

in life and since they were required for his/her use in the other

world, they were buried along with the mortal remains.

• All these certainly reflect that the 'cult of the dead' had a strong hold

on the people.

• The grave goods represented the affection and respect of the living for

their dead.

• Animism:
• Their belief in animism is reflected in animistic cults. This is evident by

the occurrence of animal bones of domestic animals like cattle,

sheep/goats and wild animals like the wolf in megaliths.

• It seems that these animals were killed for the funeral-feast and the

skeletal remains were buried in the graves, or they were sacrificed and

buried in the graves to supply food for the dead.

• Animism is also reflected by terracotta figurines of animals decorated

with garlands and ornaments.

• Sangam literature, which is contemporaneous with the end phase of the

megalithic culture in South India, also throws light on the different methods

of disposal of the dead prevalent among the megalithic people.

• Many of the earlier beliefs continued during the Sangam age.
• So, we may assume that the religious practices referred to in the

Sangam literature reflect, to an extent,those that prevailed amongthe

megalithic people.

• The tradition of associating stone with the dead has survived in South

India till late times and the hero stones or Virakal and Mastikal are

examples of this.

Polity

• The differences in the size of monuments and the nature of the grave valuables

reflecting differentiation in status and ranking, also suggest the nature of

contemporary political power.

• The construction of a huge monument involving the mobilisation of substantial

collective labour implies the power of the buried individual to command it.

• In the light of the fact that the contemporary people were tribal descent groups, we

may assume the prevalence of chiefly power, i.e. chiefdoms.

• The Late phase of the megalithic culture coincides with the Early historical period as

reflected by the excavation at many sites. So, the Sangam works also help us in

understanding the period.

• The chief of the tribal group is referred to as Perumakan (great son) in the

literary texts.

• He commanded the entire material and cultural resources of his clan.
• Thisatteststhattheseelaborateburialsprobably were ofthe chiefsordescent

heads.

• This period witnessed numerous small chiefdoms co-existing and contesting against

one another and anticipating the emergence of big chiefdoms by the turn of the

Christian era.

• The megalithic people had been interacting and exchanging material and

cultural goods with one another.

■ There was need-oriented and use-value based interaction at the level

of clans.

• But at the level of chiefs it was competitive and hence a combative process

of plundering raids, both inter-clan and intra-clan, led by chiefs for predatory

control.

■ This led to subjugation of one chief by the other which in turn helped

the emergence of bigger chiefs and the formations of bigger

chiefdoms.

■ This is testified by the prestige goods and varieties of ceramics and

other artefacts found in the graves.

• These armed fights among the clans must have resulted in the death of many chiefs

and warriors.

• Probably, this was the reason for erecting numerous sepulchral monuments

during the megalithic period.

• This also accounts for the emergence of the cult of heroism and ancestral

worship.

• Through armed confrontation and predatory subjugation the cultural and political

power of a few chiefdoms became more evolved over the years and they emerged as

bigger chiefdoms.

• We can infer that the last phase of the megalithic period which is

contemporaneous to the Sangam period, marked the march towards bigger

chiefdoms as mentioned in Tamil heroic texts

Legacy of the Megalithic Culture

• Megalithism is still alive amongst different tribes in India, for example
• the Maria Gonds of Bastar in Madhya Pradesh,
• the Bondos and Gadabas of Orissa,
• the Oraons and Mundas of Chotanagpur region of Jharkhand, and
• the Khasis and Nagas of Assam.
• Theirmonuments,whichareofamemorialnature,includedolmens,stone-circlesand

menhirs.

• The North-east Indianmegalithiccultureseemstohavea South-east Asianaffiliation

rather than the western influence.

• In South Indian context, the remnants of megalithism among the Todas of Nilgiris

are very significant.

• It helpsusinunderstandingtheprobable customsthat existed amongthenow

extinct megalithic builders of South India.

• The existing burial practices of the Todas include many common features of

the megalithic burials with grave goods including food items and the use of

stone circles to mark the place of the burial.

Limitations of the Sources for the Study of Megalithic Culture

• The major problem that comes in the way of studying megalithic culture is the form

in which the sources are available to us.

• Firstly, as almost the whole of our evidence is collected from the burials, the

knowledge about the conditions and methods of their everyday life is necessarily

limited to the evidence supplied by their grave furniture and the various inferences

that can be drawn from the observation of the architecture of the graves and

connected considerations.

• The literary evidence which includes the accounts of Graeco-Roman writers and the

ancient Tamil texts (Sangam literature) have their own limitations as their period

marks the end phase of the megalithic culture.

• Vertical digging in excavations of different habitation sites with the aim of unfolding

the cultural sequence of these sites provides us with evidence, which is scant and

limited in nature.

• Moreover,thelackofsettlementremainsassociatedwiththeburialsisthefrequently

raised issue in the context of the peninsular Indian megaliths.

• Due to the absence of habitation sites in regions like Kerala, the analysis of the

settlement pattern of the megalithic culture has become a difficult task.

• The settlement sites could have provided a variety of evidence in addition to

the stratigraphic data for separating periods of various culture strands, thus,

making the reconstruction of the cultural history of megalithic people more

elusive.

• Some have even questioned the authenticity of the megaliths as a burial.

Megalithicculturecanbeconsideredafoundationalphaseofthehistoryofpeninsular India

in the following ways:

• Beginning of the sedentary life
• Megalithiccommunitieslivedonacombinationofagriculture,hunting,fishing,

and animal husbandry.

• There is also evidence of craft traditions.
• These features, along with the megalithic monuments themselves, suggest

sedentary living.

• Widespread use of iron
• Iron objects generally outnumber objects made of other metals.
• The large volume and variety of iron artefacts include utensils, weapons

(arrowheads, spearheads, swords, knives, etc.), carpentry tools (axes, chisels,

adzes, etc.), and agricultural implements (sickles, hoes, coulters).

• Well-developed traditions of specialized crafts
• Different kinds of pottery have been found, including BRW.
• There is also evidence of bead making. Grave goods include etched carnelian

beads and beads of other materials as well.

• There are copper and bronze artefacts such as utensils, bowls, and bangles; a

few silver and gold ornaments also occur.

• Development of metallurgy
• Different sorts of metallurgical techniques were used in the manufacture of

metal artefacts. Some of the copper and bronze objects were evidently cast in

moulds, others were hammered into shape.

• Some communities knew how to alloy metals. There is also evidence of local

smelting of iron at Paiyampalli.

• Beginning of trade
• Some megalithic sites were centres of craft production linked to networks of

exchange. This is suggested by the location of several large megalithic

settlements on the trade routes of the early historical period.

• Interregional trade is also suggested by the distribution of non-local items of

precious metals and semi-precious metals.

• Rock paintings
• Paintings found at the megalithic sites show fighting scenes, cattle raids,

hunting scenes,

• scenes of people dancing in groups, horse raiders, flora, birds, sun motifs etc.
• Community work
• The construction of the megaliths must have involved community endeavour.

These monuments must have been sites of rituals that formed an important

part of the social and cultural lives of people.

• The practice of making megaliths continues among certain tribal communities

of India.